Current:Home > ScamsJustice Department to monitor voting in Ohio county after sheriff’s comment about Harris supporters -OceanicInvest
Justice Department to monitor voting in Ohio county after sheriff’s comment about Harris supporters
View
Date:2025-04-19 11:32:16
RAVENNA, Ohio (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department will send election monitors to an Ohio county where a sheriff was recently accused of intimidating voters in a social media post, federal officials announced Tuesday.
The Justice Department said it will monitor Portage County’s compliance with federal voting rights laws during early voting and on Election Day. The agency said it regularly sends staff to counties around the U.S. to monitor compliance with the federal Voting Rights Act and other civil rights statutes related to elections and voting.
“Voters in Portage County have raised concerns about intimidation resulting from the surveillance and the collection of personal information regarding voters, as well as threats concerning the electoral process,” the Justice Department said in a news release.
The agency did not elaborate.
Portage County Sheriff Bruce Zuchowski, a Republican running for reelection, came under fire for a social media post last month in which he said people with Kamala Harris yard signs should have their addresses written down so that immigrants can be sent to live with them if the Democrat wins the presidency. He also likened people in the country illegally to “human locusts.”
The sheriff’s comment about Harris’ supporters — made on his personal Facebook account and his campaign’s account — sparked outrage among some Democrats who took it as a threat. His supporters argued he was making a political point about unrestrained immigration and that he was exercising his right to free speech.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio demanded that Zuchowski remove the post and threatened to sue him, asserting he’d made an unconstitutional, “impermissible threat” against residents who wanted to display political yard signs.
Zuchowski later took down the post.
The sheriff’s office said Tuesday that “monitoring of voting locations/polls by the DOJ is conducted nationwide and is not unique to Portage County. This is a normal practice by the DOJ.”
Sherry Rose, president of the League of Women Voters of Kent, a good-government group in Portage County, said she knows some voters complained about Zuchowski to the Justice Department. She said she has seen “concerning rhetoric” on social media after the sheriff’s comments, and an increase in theft of yard signs, but that early voting itself has gone smoothly so far.
“We have seen no instances” of intimidation during early voting, “so that bodes well,” Rose said. “So that I think is where we want voters of Portage County to feel confidence, in that voting system.”
Elsewhere in Ohio, a divided state Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the Ohio Democratic Party’s challenge to a directive from Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose preventing the use of drop boxes by people helping voters with disabilities.
The secretary issued his order after a federal judge struck down portions of Ohio’s sweeping 2023 election law in July, allowing more classes of people to help voters with disabilities deliver their ballots. LaRose’s order required such helpers to sign an attestation inside the board of elections office during operating hours.
The majority said the plaintiffs had brought their challenge too close to the election. Judge Pierre Bergeron wrote in dissent that LaRose’s rule “cruelly targets persons who must, by necessity, rely on the help and grace of others.”
LaRose called the move a precaution against “ballot harvesting.” He said in a statement Tuesday that he was “grateful the court has allowed us to proceed with our efforts to protect the integrity of Ohio’s elections.”
veryGood! (788)
Related
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Migrant crossings along U.S.-Mexico border plummeted in June amid stricter asylum rules
- Ecuador’s High Court Affirms Constitutional Protections for the Rights of Nature in a Landmark Decision
- Scott Disick Spends Time With His and Kourtney Kardashian's Kids After Her Pregnancy News
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- How Shanna Moakler Reacted After Learning Ex Travis Barker Is Expecting Baby With Kourtney Kardashian
- Thom Browne's win against Adidas is also one for independent designers, he says
- What's the deal with the platinum coin?
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Here's what the latest inflation report means for your money
Ranking
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- 2 Birmingham firefighters shot, seriously wounded at fire station; suspect at large
- Is There Something Amiss With the Way the EPA Tracks Methane Emissions from Landfills?
- Southwest faces investigation over holiday travel disaster as it posts a $220M loss
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Inside Clean Energy: Here Is How Covid Is Affecting Some of the Largest Wind, Solar and Energy Storage Projects
- Scott Disick Spends Time With His and Kourtney Kardashian's Kids After Her Pregnancy News
- Black men have lowest melanoma survival rate compared to other races, study finds
Recommendation
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
Migration could prevent a looming population crisis. But there are catches
Gwen Stefani Gives Father's Day Shout-Out to Blake Shelton After Gavin Rossdale Parenting Comments
Tesla's profits soared to a record – but challenges are mounting
Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
Ecuador’s High Court Affirms Constitutional Protections for the Rights of Nature in a Landmark Decision
The First Native American Cabinet Secretary Visits the Land of Her Ancestors and Sees Firsthand the Obstacles to Compromise
How Shanna Moakler Reacted After Learning Ex Travis Barker Is Expecting Baby With Kourtney Kardashian